Posts Tagged ‘ Brain ’

fMRI Foundations Get a Little More Secure


“it’s all about getting to the truth” – Karl Deisseroth. May 20th Nature Podcast

fMRI, it’s everywhere. From studies looking at how we separate fantasy from reality to identifying psychopaths. The technique offers a very powerful way analyse that most elusive of domains, the contents of another person’s brain. Even so the technology is not without it’s flaws, one flaw is the method of determining relevant data from noise. Another is that the most common signal studied with fMRI, blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals, are only an indirect measure of neural activity. Further, it has been until now* an assumption with little empirical support.

To put this in proper perspective it is necessary to explain a little more fully what a BOLD signal is. Essentially the oxygenation level of the blood can be determined via the fMRI by discerning the difference in magnetic properties of oxygenated versus deoxygenated haemoglobin (the protein responsible for shuttling oxygen around our body and keeping us alive). Now, the link between blood oxygenation levels and brain activity is made like this: active neurons are performing cellular functions, cellular functions require energy, energy requires metabolism, metabolism requires oxygen, higher metabolism requires higher oxygen levels. Thus you can make a logical connection from an increase in neuron activity (representing brain activity) and an increase in oxygenated blood flow to an area of the brain.

Because neurons do not have an internal supply of either glucose or oxygen the chain of reasoning above is valid but not having direct empirical support is a potential weakness. To the rescue comes Optogenetics, this relatively new field concerns itself with engineering neurons in such a way as to allow them to be activated by pulses of light. I think you can see where this is going.

The paper “Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring” published in Nature details how this technique can help in fMRI work.  In this case rats were used as a model animal instead of humans. The procedure consisted of injecting the brains of the rats with a viral vector that was targeted to particular cell types in the brain, cortical neurons to be specific. This caused these cells to express a light sensitive protein that would in essence cause the cell to be activated**.

By specifically targeting the cell types of most interest this technique has shown that the BOLD signal detailed above really is correlated with neuronal activity. In reality, while this is an important result of the early implementation of this approach and provides a firmer foundation for the theoretical underpinnings of fMRI work it’s true power lies elsewhere.

In addition to activating the cells of a specific region of the brain this technique can also highlight larger networks that operate within the brain. Neurons do not fire in a vacuum, often one will trigger another which set off a third and so on in a cascading chain which results in thoughts or actions. By selectively activating areas of the brain researchers can then watch the downstream effects of those activations in other parts of the brain that were not directly stimulated. In this way we can effectively build a map of neuronal networks.

This approach will both stimulate new research and perhaps provide a method of validating conclusions drawn from previous work. This looks to be an important new tool for brain research, the full power of which we may not yet realise.

Now that’s exciting.

Footnotes:

* For a given definition of “now”, which corresponds to earlier this year when the paper was published. I really need to get to this stuff faster.

** An ion channel protein, stimulation of which causes ions to flow through the cell membrane. Just like the process that occurs when a neuronal signal is initiated.


Lee, J., Durand, R., Gradinaru, V., Zhang, F., Goshen, I., Kim, D., Fenno, L., Ramakrishnan, C., & Deisseroth, K. (2010). Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring Nature, 465 (7299), 788-792 DOI: 10.1038/nature09108

Enhanced by Zemanta

Managing Multi-tasking


It is virtually taken for granted nowadays that multi-tasking is a must. The demands on our time seem to be coming ever faster and in more complicated ways than we ever had to deal with before. Most of us are resigned to the fact that we are expected to be able to type up emails while on the phone and organise our calendar at the same time. If you’re a teenager (or ultra-hip oldie), throw in txting friends, updating your Facebook status and keeping a running commentary on pointless activities on Twitter. Previous studies on multi-tasking have shown that switching rapidly between tasks incurs a cost in time but what is actually happening when we do two (or more) things at once?

It certainly seems when we perform two tasks we are familiar with that we drop into “autopilot” where we might do one task without conscious thought while we focus our attention on another task, say driving while talking to a passenger. While we are deep in discussion it seems as though we are allowing the actions required for driving to be  handled by a “lower” part of our brain while we actively think about appropriate responses to the conversation. Anyone who has accidentally “driven to work” while meaning to go somewhere else would swear this interpretation is true.

Recent work published in the July16th issue of Neuron however disputes this interpretation of how our brain works. The study seems to show that instead of tasks becoming automatic and thus not requiring oversight by the pre-frontal cortex (responsible for conscious control), this area actually works more efficiently and switches tasks faster. In other words we are still only doing one thing at a time but swapping between tasks fast enough that it gives the appearance of multi-tasking. In the words of the researchers:

“The effect of training is to speed up information processing through this pre-frontal bottleneck, thereby reducing temporal processing overlap of the sensory-motor tasks in this brain region”

So, next time you boast of being a multi-tasking maven you can add that this actually means your brain works faster than those lounging in non-multitasking mediocrity. On the other hand, no need to inspire unnecessary ire among your peers unless you can handle the multiple tasks of running away and dodging projectiles.

Fast Thoughts are Happy Thoughts


Ever noticed that when you are excited or happy your thoughts seem to zip hither, thither and yon at a dizzying pace? Perhaps at the same time you also had feelings of increased energy, creativity and self esteem. These are all symptoms of the psychiatric condition of mania, but you’re probably fine. The persistent linking of mania with rapid thoughts has lead some researchers to suspect that the speed of thought itself, and not necessarily the content of those thoughts, has a direct effect on a person’s mood. Thus merely thinking at a faster pace can create a more positive mood, along with those other symptoms, I mean normal feelings, of creativity, energy, etc.

With this approach as their starting point psychological scientists Emily Pronin and Daniel Wegner, of Princeton and Harvard University respectively, conducted an experiment to elucidate the exact effect of thought speed on mood, independent of the contents of those thoughts. To this end they recruited a number of students to read statements aloud at different speeds, the statements were either fast and positive (eg ‘‘Wow! I feel great!’’) or fast and negative (eg ‘‘I want to go to sleep and never wake up’’) and were contrasted with the reverse combinations, slow/positive, slow/negative. The results showed that the speed of a person’s thinking does indeed have an impact on their mood independent of what they are thinking. Those who read depressing statements fast had a more positive outlook than those who read the depressing statements more slowly.

This work has implications for the treatment of both mania and depression, having manic patients work to slow down their thought processes or those suffering depression increase the speed of theirs might be a more sustainable and empowering (for the patient) method of treating the conditions. Not to mention how this might affect business brainstorming sessions, want to boost your team’s creative output? Just get them doing quick mental exercises to get their brains in the mood. Have some bad news to give? Say it really fast.

The Brain


Not to be immodest but I use 100% of my brain, not the ten percent that popular culture proposes. Of course, so do you. It’s not clear how this piece of brain lore got started but there’s no tiptoeing around this one, it’s just wrong. Firstly, our brains are enormously costly to have. Your brain weighs 5% of your total body mass but consumes 20% of the oxygen and glucose used by the body. So this white elephant would have been severely trimmed down by natural selection long ago if 90% of it were not used.

Secondly, the brain has been extensively mapped over the years and each part shown to have a function. Mostly it is those who have an interest in convincing people that there is and easy way to improve themselves who have motivation to perpetuate this nugget of mis-information. “Why work harder” they imply “When we can just show you how to use more of your brain”.

In fact there is more and more research showing that the brain not only is fully utilised but will actually rewire itself depending on how it is used. Once it was thought to be an organ who’s best days were behind it while you were still in childhood. That it could only look forward to neuronal trimming an becoming more and more set in it’s ways. Now we are realising that the humble human brain can update it’s hardware, so to speak, depending on usage. The old addage of “Use it or Lose it” certainly applies.

Not only can stroke victims co-opt other parts of their brains to compensate but people who regularly give their brain a work out can offset the onset of dementia in old age. So get learning now and you won’t go loopy later.

Think about it.

Resources:

http://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=44

http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/9X/04714349/047143499X.pdf

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=A2B11F10-E7F2-99DF-395CA5E198A96C7D&sc=I100322

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=BAB80AA1-E7F2-99DF-3A640AF2C3600666&sc=I100322

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000A9E26-624B-128A-9DD683414B7F0000&sc=I100322

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers